February 20, 2013

Are you ready to become a superintelligent and hyperconnected proto-cyborg?

Google recently released a second video promoting their Google Glasses, scheduled to hit the mass market in early 2014. (Here’s their first marketing demo.)

With any new technology that we adopt it’s wise to ask ourselves not only what we gain but what we lose, both as individuals and as a society. For the Google Glasses, the full answers to these questions will remain elusive until the (fun!) experiments begin, and especially after use becomes normalized. But here are a few things I imagine might be issues of concern as we integrate augmented reality (AR) glasses into our lives. Some of these are intensified versions of existing concerns, while others will be totally new:

1) Privacy—When the Internet is worn on the face and used throughout waking hours, when you and others are impulsively recording your actions and immediately uploading them to the cloud, the issue of privacy protection from states, businesses, and others with an interest in your data (aka your personal life) is likely to become even more important than it is today.

2) Relationships—If adopted as an everyday technology, how will Google Glasses change how we relate to others, both those in our physical vicinity and those far away? We will soon have the ability to experience, in a much more intimate and sustained way, our waking hours with a loved one across the world, or across town. What will this mean for people directly in front of us? As we think about the next commands to send to Glass, and as our attention is interrupted by new information appearing on the tiny screens in front of our eyes, we risk becoming more experientially detached from our immediate physical world. When facial recognition technology—which already exists—gets added to AR glasses, which it eventually will, we’ll have to deal with a whole new set of privacy concerns. For example, whatever information exists about people on the web today will be available in real time, as we interact with each other. We can expect to know much more about new friends, acquaintances, and colleagues than we do now. Nameless strangers on the street will start to be googled. (Can you say, “OK glass, google that person?”)

3) The End of Loneliness?—New media technology is changing how people experience loneliness. Soon people will have the ability to remain continually connected to their online social network from the time they wake up to the time they fall asleep. It’s possible this may not be a good thing.

4) Mental Health—How will the ability for constant online connection through the visual field affect cognition, emotional experience, psychopathology including anxiety and depression, and child development? As we become expert web surfers—as when we do anything repeatedly—our amazing brains physiologically rewire themselves to adapt to the specific demands of the new behavior; we both gain and lose certain capabilities. Scientific research already shows that the simple availability of modern digital distractions negatively affects memory, comprehension, attention, and concentration. When we become expert Glass users, our brains will likewise rewire themselves and we will gain and lose other capabilities. Exactly what will be gained and what will be lost remains to be seen.

5) Information Overload—If you already feel overwhelmed by information, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet!

I’m still trying to decide whether this product appears more awesome or more scary overall. Does it present a kind of landmark, a technological fork in the road where (for the minority on the planet who can afford them) some of us will decide to move that much closer to physical merger with gadgets, while others will choose to stay with traditional notions of being human? Maybe it’s too early for that conversation (it’s coming eventually, and possibly sooner than you think). What we can say for sure is that if AR glasses are adopted on a scale wide enough to turn them into a cultural phenomenon, they will—like other major media technologies—change society and individuals in unpredictable ways.

Stay tuned…

December 21, 2012

This video report from the FT takes a corporate perspective on the best ways to encourage people to give up their personal information.

How comfortable are you with sharing your information with big business?

Financial Times:

Business is struggling to cope with an avalanche of valuable information from ‘big data’. Ravi Mattu, FT business life editor, talks to eBay and the designer of the iPhone about using good design to persuade consumers to give up their data and the benefits that brings.

December 4, 2012
Apple Censors Drone War: Company calls political app 'objectionable and crude'

Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting:

The Internet makes it easier to share and publish information that Big Media won’t publish themselves. But that doesn’t mean powerful companies still won’t try to control access to that information.

Apple recently rejected—for the third time—the Drones+ app, a tool for iPhones that adds a location to a map every time a drone strike is reported. The database of drone strikes is maintained by the well-respected Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

Our friends at RootsAction are stepping up to protest this act of censorship. If you think Apple should stop trying to shield its users and customers from the reality of U.S. warmaking, then please add your name to this petition.

August 21, 2012

Beyond the SuperPACs: “Nonprofits” Tied to Karl Rove, Koch Brothers Spend Millions on Elections and Call it Public Welfare

Democracy Now!:

With the presidential election less than three months away, Republicans and Democrats are blanketing the airwaves with campaign ads. Much has been written about the super PACs behind these ads, but far less is known about social welfare nonprofits [or “dark money PACs”] that are far outspending super PACs on TV advertising in the presidential race. As of August 8, these nonprofits had spent more than $71 million on ads mentioning a candidate for president, whereas super PACs have spent an estimated $56 million. And, unlike super PACs, these organizations enjoy tax-exempt status and do not have to disclose the identity of their donors. A new investigation by ProPublica reveals how these nonprofits are exploiting their special tax status to mount a secretly funded, permanent campaign. We speak to investigative reporter Kim Barker.

August 8, 2012
‘Bank of Dave’ touts loans and sense

FT: David Fishwick, started his own lending institution, the “Bank of Dave,” for a BBC television show after becoming infuriated with the banking industry. “If you rob a bank you go to jail. If a banker robs you, they get a bonus,” he says.

August 7, 2012
What are Obama's and Romney's plans for the future of the Internet?

With the translation of the Declaration of Internet Freedom into 63 languages, the U.S. Presidential candidates need to clarify their positions on the future of the Internet. The next president will have an enormous amount of power to determine where we go from here.

July 29, 2012
Pressed for Time? Take a Minute to Feel Awe

LiveScience: If you’re feeling pressed for time, try hiking to a mountain vista or listening to a masterful symphony. New research suggests that the resulting awe may leave you feeling less rushed.

Experiencing awe makes people feel as if time is plentiful, according to a new study to be published in the journal Psychological Science.

June 17, 2012
Rhyme & Reason: My new column for Seymour Magazine

The creative process, universal and ubiquitous, remains largely mysterious. In the coming months, this space will be dedicated to a wide-ranging exploration of this process in an effort to foster reflection about, enhance, and cultivate artistic creativity.

May 31, 2012

Lee Rainie of the Pew Research Center and co-author of the new book Networked discusses recent behavioral changes in mobile online media usage for different groups and what it all means.

May 30, 2012
Are you a Facebook addict?

Facebook’s business model, it should come as no surprise, involves getting users as hooked as possible on the web’s premier walled garden. The more time users spend clicking, sharing, liking, and posting status updates, the more profitable Facebook becomes.

So if you feel that you spend more time on Facebook than you want, this is hardly a coincidence. It’s the preferred result of sophisticated corporate research and development, the goal of which is what industry insiders call “stickiness”.

Is it possible you’re dependent on the online blue and white to an unhealthy degree?

To test this question objectively, Norwegian psychologist Cecilie Andreassen at the University of Bergen has developed the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale. Her research, published last month in the journal Psychological Reports, using this new scale has found some interesting results, including that people who are anxious and socially insecure use Facebook more than those who score low on these traits.

April 4, 2012

Google unveiled their new augmented reality glasses today with this video. How will this new media environment change individuals and societies?

April 3, 2012

What goes on behind your web browser? How does online tracking work? Who does the tracking? How is your online profile created? How is the information used?

Bob McChesney interviewed Joe Turow about his new book, The Daily You: How the New Advertising Industry Is Defining Your Identity and Your Worth. The revealing, in-depth, 57-minute conversation starts at 6m30s. Worth listening to for anyone who uses the web.

February 26, 2012
Google augmented reality glasses to hit market in late 2012

Get ready for a landmark shift in human mental and social environments: Google is getting set to release Internet eyeglasses.

As augmented reality (AR) technology improves and is mass marketed we will increasingly create and personalize our own social worlds. When AR is merged with facial recognition technology, the possibilities become extraordinary. Think Facebook 2.0, in 3D, overlaying real life. Certain people on the street will be accentuated based on chosen characteristics (maybe their body will be outlined in red or blue, or a star or halo will hang over their head) while others can be de-emphasized, dehumanized, or otherwise transmogrified. Architecture, advertising, even the sky can be structured and painted based on personal tastes, just as your computer desktop is today.

It will begin with AR glasses and continue with AR contact lenses. As our subjectivities are restructured, the ways in which we perceive the world will become less similar. We will need to ask ourselves new (and old) questions about the degree to which we want to engage with these media, about what is gained and what is lost in our social relationships, about what it means to share an environment and live as a society, and so on.

For a good idea of the direction augmented reality is headed, take a look at Japanese architect Keiichi Matsuda’s short films.

February 6, 2012
How Facebook and Google are Using You

In this NYT op-ed, law professor Lori Andrews explains, “Ads that pop up on your screen might seem useful, or at worst, a nuisance. But they are much more than that. The bits and bytes about your life can easily be used against you. Whether you can obtain a job, credit or insurance can be based on your digital doppelgänger — and you may never know why you’ve been turned down. “

If you don’t already use the free Scroogle service to protect your searches, I highly recommend it. Scroogle is an ad-free, privacy-obsessed, backdoor google that fits right into your browser and prevents your search data from being tracked. I’ve been using it for years and it works like a charm. Your search data will not be collected and misused by third parties as described by Andrews, or otherwise distorted as described by Eli Pariser in his explanation of “filter bubbles.”  In recent weeks Scroogle appears to be undergoing increased attacks from Google, but it keeps coming back.

January 10, 2012
The Rise of Cyberschools

Alternet: The Associated Press reports that more than 200,000 kindergarten to 12th grade students are enrolled in full-time “virtual charter schools” in at least 40 [U.S.] states. That number soars to two million schoolchildren nationwide when one takes into account students who are enrolled in at least one course.